Belgravia Law is pleased to share <a href="https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/ai-errors-human-responsibility-" target="_blank" class="news-text_link">“AI errors, human responsibility?”</a>, a feature co-authored by <a href="https://belgravia.law/team/ceyda-ilgen" target="_blank" class="news-text_link">Ceyda İlgen</a> and published in the New Law Journal on 18 September 2026. It considers AI’s use in drafting, research and disclosure review alongside the danger of plausible but invented case citations.
Discussing <span class="news-text_italic-underline">Mata v Avianca and R (Ayinde) v London Borough of Haringey</span>, the authors argue that existing duties of competence, candour to the court and supervision must be applied just as rigorously to AI-assisted work. AI may save time, but it cannot assume a lawyer’s responsibility to verify material before relying on it.
