
International arbitration is a widely used method for resolving cross-border disputes. Here are answers to some frequently asked questions about international arbitration:
International arbitration is a private dispute resolution process used to resolve conflicts between parties from different countries. It provides an alternative to traditional court litigation and allows parties to choose a neutral forum and applicable rules.
International arbitration offers several advantages, including flexibility, neutrality, confidentiality, enforceability of awards across borders, and the ability to select arbitrators with expertise in the relevant field.
There are several prominent international arbitration institutions, such as the <span class="news-text_italic-underline">International Chamber of Commerce</span> (<span class="news-text_medium">ICC</span>), the <span class="news-text_italic-underline">London Court of International Arbitration</span> (<span class="news-text_medium">LCIA</span>), the <span class="news-text_italic-underline">International Centre for Dispute Resolution</span> (<span class="news-text_medium">ICDR</span>), and the <span class="news-text_italic-underline">Singapore International Arbitration Centre</span> (<span class="news-text_medium">SIAC</span>). These institutions provide rules, administrative support, and a framework for conducting arbitrations.
In international arbitration, parties have the opportunity to participate in the selection of arbitrators. Typically, each party appoints one arbitrator, and those two arbitrators then select a third arbitrator (the presiding arbitrator) to form a three-member tribunal. Alternatively, parties may opt for a sole arbitrator.
One significant advantage of international arbitration is the enforceability of arbitral awards across borders. The United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention) facilitates the enforcement of arbitral awards in over 160 countries that have ratified the convention.
National courts play a supportive role in international arbitration. They can assist with matters such as enforcing interim measures, appointing arbitrators, and setting aside or enforcing arbitral awards. However, the primary decision-making authority lies with the arbitral tribunal.
The duration of international arbitration varies depending on the complexity of the dispute, the number of parties involved, and the procedural choices made. Generally, international arbitration is considered a more expeditious method for resolving disputes compared to traditional court litigation.
The grounds for appealing an arbitral award are typically limited. Most legal systems provide limited recourse to set aside an award, usually based on grounds such as procedural irregularities, lack of jurisdiction, or public policy violations. However, the ability to appeal arbitral awards is generally more limited than in traditional court litigation.
At Belgravia Law, we are well known for our expertise in contentious matters, particularly arbitration.
Our notable achievements include:
For tailored guidance for your circumstances, please do not hesitate to reach out. Our dedicated team is committed to providing the assistance and support you require.



